摘要：

目的评估p16/Ki-67双染检测在高危（HR）人乳头瘤病毒（HPV）阳性人群中的分流效果。方法于2016年4—12月，选取在郑州大学第二附属医院妇科就诊，并进行阴道镜检查且HPV DNA检测结果为HR-HPV感染的女性为调查对象，收集其宫颈脱落细胞标本，并分别进行p16/Ki-67双染检测、HPV16/18检测、LBC检测和活检病理诊断。以活检病理结果为结局指标，计算和比较3种检测分流HR-HPV阳性者的灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。结果共发现HR-HPV阳性女性295例，年龄为（44.29±11.48）岁，其中p16/Ki-67双染检测、HPV16/18检测和LBC检测的阳性率分别为70.17%（207例）、56.95%（168例）和85.76%（253例）。以CIN2+为疾病终点指标时，3种检测方法中，p16/Ki-67双染检测的灵敏度为90.00%（95%CI：85.06%~93.43%），高于HPV16/18检测，低于LBC检测；特异度最高，为71.58%（95%CI:61.81%~79.67%）；阳性预测值最高，为86.96%（95%CI:81.69%~90.88%）；阴性预测值最高，为77.27%（95%CI:67.49%~84.78%）。以CIN3+为疾病终点指标时，p16/Ki-67双染检测的灵敏度为92.90%（95%CI:87.74%~95.99%），低于LBC检测，高于HPV16/18检测；特异度为55.00%（95%CI: 46.74%~63.00%），低于HPV16/18检测，高于LBC检测；阳性预测值为69.57%（95%CI:62.99%~75.43%），低于HPV16/18检测，高于LBC检测；阴性预测值为87.50%（95%CI:78.99%~92.87%），高于HPV16/18检测，低于LBC检测。结论 p16/Ki-67双染检测技术作为HPV阳性妇女分流措施的效果优于HPV16/18检测和LBC检测方法。

关键词：宫颈上皮内瘤样病变;子宫颈;高危型人乳头瘤病毒阳性;p16/Ki-67双染;实验性研究

Abstract:

Objective This study aimed to evaluate the clinical performance of p16/Ki-67 dual staining for triage high risk HPV (HR-HPV) infected women.Method Target objects were women who infected HR-HPV and received colposcopy examination between April and December of 2016 at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University. Gynecologists collected the cervical exfoliated cells from eligible women for p16/Ki-67 dual staining, LBC testing and HPV DNA testing. Histology diagnosis were used as gold standard. Sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values (PPVs), negative predictive values (NPVs) of p16/Ki-67 dual staining, LBC testing and HPV16/18 testing for triage of HR-HPV positive population were calculated and compared.Results A total of 295 HR-HPV infected women were selected, and the mean age was (44.29±11.48) years old. Positive rates of p16/Ki-67 dual staining, HPV16/18 testing and LBC testing were 70.17% (207), 56.95% (168) and 85.76% (253), respectively. When CIN2+as the endpoint, among the three triage methods, sensitivity of p16/Ki-67 dual staining was 90.00% (95%CI: 85.06%-93.43%), higher than the value of HPV 16/18 testing, but lower than the value of LBC testing. Specificity, PPV and NPV of p16/Ki-67 dual staining were the highest [71.58% (95%CI: 61.81%-79.67%), 86.96% (95%CI:81.69%-90.88%) and 77.27% (95%CI: 67.49%-84.78%)]. When detection for CIN3+, sensitivity of p16/Ki-67 dual staining was 92.90% (95%CI: 87.74%-95.99%), lower than the value of LBC testing, but higher than the value of HPV16/18 testing. Specificity of p16/Ki-67 dual staining was 55.00% (95%CI: 46.74%-63.00%), lower than the value of HPV16/18 testing, but higher than the value of LBC testing. PPV of p16/Ki-67 dual staining was 69.57% (95%CI: 62.99%-75.43%), lower than the value of HPV 16/18 testing, but higher than the value of LBC testing. NPV of p16/Ki-67 dual staining was 87.50% (95%CI: 78.99%-92.87%), higher than value of HPV 16/18 testing, but lower than the value of LBC testing.Conclusion p16/Ki-67 dual staining has better clinical effects than HPV 16/18 testing and LBC testing for triage women with HR-HPV infection.

Key words: Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia;Ervix Uteri;HR-HPV positive;p16/Ki-67 dual staining;Experiment study

发表日期：2020/2

引用本文：

http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2020.02.015

链接本文：

http://www.pubhealth.org.cn/new/cn/book_show.asp?id=6418

图/表:

10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2020.02.015.T001:表1 不同病理诊断级别调查对象p16/Ki-67双染检测、HPV16/18检测和LBC检测的阳性率
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2020.02.015.T002
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2020.02.015.T003

参考文献:

[1]ChenW, ZhengR, BaadePD, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2016,66(2):115-132. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21338.
[2]WHO. Screening as well as vaccination is essential in the fight against cervical cancer[EB/OL].[2019-09-01]. http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/topics/cancers/fight-cervical-cancer/en/.
[3]赵方辉，章文华，潘秦镜,等.宫颈癌多种筛查方案的研究[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2010,32(6):420-424. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2010.06.005.
[4]ShanmugasundaramS, YouJ. Targeting persistent human papillomavirus infection[J]. Viruses, 2017, 9(8): 229. DOI: 10.3390/v9080229.
[5]WentzensenN, SchiffmanM, PalmerT, et al. Triage of HPV positive women in cervical cancer screening[J]. J Clin Virol, 2016,76Suppl 1:S49-49S55. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2015.11.015.
[6]董丽，胡尚英，张倩,等.山西省宫颈癌筛查队列中人乳头瘤病毒基因型别分布10年动态变化规律研究[J].中华流行病学杂志,2017,38(1):20-25. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2017.01.004.
[7]赵方辉，陈俊峰，高晓虹,等.子宫颈癌筛查及早诊早治方案的绩效和卫生经济学评价[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2012,34(8):632-636. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2012.08.017.
[8]赵雪莲，热米拉·热扎克，胡尚英,等.高危型HPV DNA单独检测及与薄层液基细胞学联合筛查对宫颈癌及宫颈高度病变的筛查效果比较[J].中华预防医学杂志,2018,52(5):469-474. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2018.05.004.
[9]WentzensenN, von Knebel DoeberitzM. Biomarkers in cervical cancer screening[J]. Dis Markers, 2007,23(4):315-330. DOI: 10.1155/2007/678793.
[10]GoodmanA. HPV testing as a screen for cervical cancer[J]. BMJ, 2015,350:h2372. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h2372.
[11]陈汶，于露露，王红,等. cobas4800高危型人乳头瘤病毒检测技术在子宫颈癌前病变筛查和细胞学转诊中的应用[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2012,34(7):543-548. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2012.07.014.
[12]潘秦镜，李凌，张询,等.液基细胞学筛查宫颈癌的研究[J].中华肿瘤杂志, 2001,23(4):309-312.DOI:10.3760/j.issn:0253-3766.2001.04.012.
[13]王海瑞，廖光东，陈汶,等. p16/Ki-67免疫细胞化学双染在宫颈癌筛查中的应用价值[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2017,39(8):636-640. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2017.08.015.
[14]中华预防医学会疫苗与免疫分会.子宫颈癌等人乳头瘤病毒相关疾病免疫预防专家共识[J].中华预防医学杂志,2019,53(8):761-803. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253?9624.2019.08.001.
[15]WangHR, LiYC, GuoHQ, et al. A cocktail of p16INK4a and Ki-67, p16INK4a and minichromosome maintenance protein 2 as triage tests for human papillomavirus primary cervical cancer screening[J]. Oncotarget, 2017,8(48):83890-83899. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.19870.
[16]YuLL, ChenW, LeiXQ, et al. Evaluation of p16/Ki-67 dual staining in detection of cervical precancer and cancers: a multicenter study in China[J]. Oncotarget, 2016,7(16):21181-21189. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.8307.
[17]SilvaDC, Gon?alvesAK, CobucciRN, et al. Immunohistochemical expression of p16, Ki-67 and p53 in cervical lesions -A systematic review[J]. Pathol Res Pract, 2017,213(7):723-729. DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2017.03.003.
[18]ScholzenT, GerdesJ. The Ki-67 protein: from the known and the unknown[J]. J Cell Physiol, 2000,182(3):311-322. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4652(200003)182∶3<311::AID-JCP1>3.0.CO;2-9.
[19]LiaoGD, SellorsJW, SunHK, et al. p16INK4A immunohistochemical staining and predictive value for progression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1: a prospective study in China[J]. Int J Cancer, 2014,134(7):1715-1724. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.28485.
[20]高燕，岳文涛.人乳头瘤病毒致癌机制及相关疫苗研究进展[J].国际病毒学杂志,2019,26(1):69-72. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4092.2019.01.020.
[21]TjalmaW. Diagnostic performance of dual-staining cytology for cervical cancer screening: a systematic literature review[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2017,210:275-280. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.01.009.
[22]IkenbergH, BergeronC, SchmidtD, et al. Screening for cervical cancer precursors with p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology: results of the PALMS study[J]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2013,105(20):1550-1557. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djt235.
[23]StanczukGA, BaxterGJ, CurrieH, et al. Defining optimal triage strategies for hrHPV screen-positive women-an evaluation of HPV 16/18 genotyping, cytology, and p16/Ki-67 Cytoimmunochemistry[J]. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2017,26(11):1629-1635. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0534.
[24]EbischRM, van der HorstJ, HermsenM, et al. Evaluation of p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology as triage test for high-risk human papillomavirus-positive women[J]. Mod Pathol, 2017,30(7):1021-1031. DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2017.16.
[25]OuhYT, MinKJ, ChoHW, et al. Prevalence of human papillomavirus genotypes and precancerous cervical lesions in a screening population in the Republic of Korea, 2014-2016[J]. J Gynecol Oncol, 2018,29(1):e14. DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2018.29.e14.
[26]DunneEF, UngerER, SternbergM, et al. Prevalence of HPV infection among females in the United States[J]. JAMA, 2007,297(8):813-819. DOI: 10.1001/jama.297.8.813.
[27]MarkowitzLE, HaririS, LinC, et al. Reduction in human papillomavirus (HPV) prevalence among young women following HPV vaccine introduction in the United States, National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, 2003-2010[J]. J Infect Dis, 2013,208(3):385-393. DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jit192.
[28]WentzensenN, FettermanB, CastlePE, et al. p16/Ki-67 Dual Stain Cytology for Detection of Cervical Precancer in HPV-Positive Women[J]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2015,107(12):djv257. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djv257.
[29]WrightTCJr, BehrensCM, Ranger-MooreJ, et al. Triaging HPV-positive women with p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology: Results from a sub-study nested into the ATHENA trial[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2017,144(1):51-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.10.031.
[30]周爱芬，张斌，罗欣,等.武汉市17万农村妇女宫颈癌筛查方法效果评价[J].中国妇幼保健,2013,28(8):1238-1240. DOI: 10.7620/zgfybj.j.issn.1001-4411.2013.28.08.

p16/Ki-67双染监测在高危型人乳头瘤病毒阳性人群中的

摘要：